The Real Immigrants

drgonzaga wrote: You take the cake, Carch, although that wannabe Aethiop is running you a close second. Not only do you abuse History and historical constructs worse than a fantasazing 13 year old locked in a bathroom, but also sound sour divertissements, so please do not attempt word games with me. The nuances of English--or for that matter Spanish--fly well above your capacity to grasp. Look back at my original post and try to find "the" attached to Chichimecas. Nevertheless, go ahead and post additional foolishness that have little to do with History and carry absolutely no understanding that contemporary problems have far more capable people attending to them.

Do not be angry just because you are wrong, everybody can be wrong.

And to call people names like wannabe Aethiop (whoever that refers to) and similar slurs, has not so much to do with history but just shows a lack of ordinary politeness.

Calm it down guys, it may be the minefield but normal rules still apply. attack the argument, not the person, and don't bring arguments from other threads into this one - or vice versa.

drgonzaga wrote: Well, it seems no one wishes to undertake the needed corrections for a very simple reason: the perpetrators pay no heed. If you wish, Carch, to bleat on about "ordinary politeness" [when in fact given today's social milieu and the cowardice of the Internet, any level of politeness would fall under consideration as actually extraordinary!], the simple fact is that not only on "immigration" are you completely wrong but practically all your propositions that might be discernable through the usual fog of anti-Christianity, Catholic bashing, and blundering ecopathos, falls under a similar censure. I happen to live in the American Southwest and maintain residences on both sides of the border and certainly have far greater familiarity with this topic than you might ever glean from the superficial clap-trap you put forth as expertise. So back off and cease all this sniveling because you have exhausted even my rather remarkable capacity to display patience.

Well, living in that environment maybe made you homeblind and unable to view the matter in a broader perspctive.

Well, dragonzeistga, were you to lessen the whole moral high ground spiel, and refrian from such importune semantic babble fire (picture the soldiers on D-Day getting shot at with tangents and anecdotal interjections), then maybe a vis a vis discussion without interpolation would lead to a better standard of discussion. At the moment such intellectual jousting is neither condusive to progress or to a fair reflection of intellect.

Oh! Such linguistic virtuosity leaves a pang in my mammalian breast. Fly! Fly before I get struck again with such lacinating digress!

 

 

No less strange than a lacinating digress, gcle, but a fascinating display of migrant thread-hopping nevertheless. Not that the construction of this thread fails to support these sopholoric interludes. In contemporary society, immigration is a fact of life and accomplished quite simply under legal venues. Undocumented aliens are another matter entirely and, often, a direct product of criminal activity thus constituting a serious threat to social and political stability. Nevertheless, there are jokers who go out of their way to either incite racial hatred or rationalize the problem with all type of Humpty Dumpty logic. The charlatans we have here bloviate about Amerinds, reservations, "suppressors" and heaven knows what other fancies for no other reason than to hear themselves exercise their digestive tracts. The literature on the topic is voluminous, not only with respect to the situation in the United States but internationally as well. For example, here is an overview with respect to the US in 2007:

You can't even get the quotes right, can you, and alter them for your little game...not the first time but then trolls are so predictable. 

Thread locked. For obvious reasons.