Macedonian terrorists

every balkan state while in its national birth labour had have own guerrillas in one or another time defying the imperial authority on the lands which they've claim that is their ethnic territory, macedonians too, although they while without real support by the european elites became more and more left on their own, which was the main reason they didnt succeed in liberating Macedonia, usually just backed by the neighboring european vasals, misfortune that led to divide in IMRO, > the macedonian revolutionary freedom organisation, which despite all difficulties managed to pull by their own the First Modern Socialistic Republic in the World that lastet for 7 days, > The famous Krushevo Republic, it was in a way freedom mirror to the fake freemasonic states around Macedonia, tho if IMRO got large support form the west would make an vasal kingdome from Macedonia too as all its neighbors, but probably the stubbornness of the macedonian guerrillas led to socialistic rush than just new elitist substitution for the ottoman empire, altho even from the beginning in IMRO were present masonic poltrons that have from start disrupt the pure idealism with their masonic meddling eg. the motto freedom or death is masonic, some will say just local momentum, ok but the swear with pistol and knife on the Bible resembles almost occult recruitment ritual, and lets say that this was also local know-how, but when You learn that there were indeed freemasons as leaders like Damyan Gruev it becomes clear that as revolutionaries they've been hostages of some freemasonic agendas, in which obviously there was no place for independent Macedonia, and probably the rush for early uprising was instigated coz these reasons!?

as revolutionary org. in the beginning IMRO for sure havent such intentions to go to extreme in their terrorist plots, actually they became known as most clean subversive group in europe which instigated the Salonica Attacks in middle of the city but without any civilian casualty! rare case of preWW1 terrorist plots with such fine tunes to shaken the system but with no spilling of innocent blood , in this case as way to attract the western attention to the macedonian question ...      

later IMRO after the failed 1903 Ilinden Uprising, the IMRO revolutionary organisation split in two factions, altho even before present as such but not so apparent like the autonomous and centralist wing of IMRO i.e. socialist and royalists, the second in the hands of the bulgrarian lodges which eventually promoted the notorious leader Vancho Mihailov, with him they've became unprecedentedly most violent terrorist group in europe which e.g. planned assassination on the turkish sultan [1] and has assassinated the serbian [2] and greek king [3] and later sided through the bulgarians as axis poltrons with nazi abwehr as their balkan spies and assassins, altho I think that they werent so occult or puppets as were mercenaries who were seeking to grab any chance to make own free territory in Macedonia, actually they had the Pirin part of Macedonia (then and now in Bulgaria) as state in state, and eventually after ww2 they were eliminated and/or expelled from their refuge as nazi collaborators after communists got the power in Sophia, tho its difficult to know why their leader got freemasonic refuge later in Italy despite he was acting antimasonic earlier, maybe to please its new nazi-friends which actually were occult too but as teuton opposition to freemasonry, maybe this was the reason why macedonians didnt got chance for unification in the end of ww2 i.e. freemasons fear that they will have problems to control such state where all the power could fall in IMRO hands sooner or later (too "wild" to be obedient puppets) there is saying that those later IMRO terrorists were seen as idols in IRA, maybe coz their violent tactics!? and only thing that is missing today is Study for their secrete elites servitude i.e. how were they connected through which secret societies lodges to whom in particular time! in the end we can blame bulgarians for their crimes (room for it), we can blame nazis for their rise (probably tactics too), even see ww1 greek and serbian atrocities as motive for them to become what they've became, but its fact that they were macedonians with cold beasty hearts! I will say they have put a shame to the macedonian liberation ideal, which before them was the first and true socialistic in the world, thus honest like no other neighboring before ww1, in my knowledge rare honesty back then in the world ...  

if I may say, however much they were fighters for human rights defacto they were terrorists, altho they were not terrorizing the turks but the ottoman empire, simply when someone is acting as terrorist he is becoming little by little or more and more demonized, if we take for granted that the spiritual order holds this world together, thus defying it through revolutions it means that such actions will lead for unworthiness of and from Gods Grace, and only people that have revolutionary success are those who realize that they've become monsters who by all means would push their agenda having no mercy or sorrow for the victims or their own actions! even insurgency - revolution is wrong approach for settling any difference, yet we can assume that if they are not plot of some shadowy elite but mass public revolt could be seen as lessen evil, altho even then there is always someone in shadows waiting to steal the ideals and turn them in interests eg. the supposed freedom of the balkan people when while the ottoman brake was substituted the authority of the Orthodox Church by the secular ideals which actually were just means for the freemasonry to became dominant in the balkan affairs!